<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 130 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30881</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the appellant, upholding the assessing authority&#039;s decision to disallow the claim under section 80-O of the Income-tax Act. The court found the issue not highly debatable, citing a Tribunal conclusion that the deduction should be on net income, not gross income. Consequently, the court rejected the appeals, answering the questions of law in the negative and favoring the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 130 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30881</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the appellant, upholding the assessing authority&#039;s decision to disallow the claim under section 80-O of the Income-tax Act. The court found the issue not highly debatable, citing a Tribunal conclusion that the deduction should be on net income, not gross income. Consequently, the court rejected the appeals, answering the questions of law in the negative and favoring the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>