<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 428 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430004</link>
    <description>HC found the GST registration cancellation invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The respondent failed to follow Rule 25 of CGST Rules, 2017, specifically by not notifying the petitioner during physical verification and not uploading verification reports within mandated timelines. The court ordered restoration of GST registration and directed respondents to upload pending returns within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 428 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430004</link>
      <description>HC found the GST registration cancellation invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The respondent failed to follow Rule 25 of CGST Rules, 2017, specifically by not notifying the petitioner during physical verification and not uploading verification reports within mandated timelines. The court ordered restoration of GST registration and directed respondents to upload pending returns within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>