<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 424 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner&#039;s decision under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding an unsecured loan from M/s. Rams Estate for the assessment year 2016-17. The Tribunal found the original assessment order erroneous due to insufficient verification of the loan details, leading to a directive for a fresh assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the need for a new assessment to be carried out in compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 424 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner&#039;s decision under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding an unsecured loan from M/s. Rams Estate for the assessment year 2016-17. The Tribunal found the original assessment order erroneous due to insufficient verification of the loan details, leading to a directive for a fresh assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the need for a new assessment to be carried out in compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>