<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30877</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed by the revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment year 1998-99. The main issue was the direction to re-compute income under Section 115JA due to excess depreciation claimed. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous, as per the Supreme Court decision in Apollo Tyres Ltd case, and dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30877</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed by the revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment year 1998-99. The main issue was the direction to re-compute income under Section 115JA due to excess depreciation claimed. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous, as per the Supreme Court decision in Apollo Tyres Ltd case, and dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>