https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304958 Parliament's enactment under Entry 66 of List I on standards in technical education excluded parallel State and university action on approval, recognition, withdrawal of permission, or cancellation of affiliation in that field. The High Court held that the State Government and the University lacked jurisdiction to withdraw affiliation on grounds touching co-ordination and standards, and that Statute 44A could not sustain resolutions unsupported by an independent valid basis. It also held that student protection could be limited to issuance of transfer certificates for eligible students, while compulsory transfer to other colleges was declined. The University's refusal of affiliation was set aside and the State's challenge failed. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Nov 2022 12:56:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304958 Parliament's enactment under Entry 66 of List I on standards in technical education excluded parallel State and university action on approval, recognition, withdrawal of permission, or cancellation of affiliation in that field. The High Court held that the State Government and the University lacked jurisdiction to withdraw affiliation on grounds touching co-ordination and standards, and that Statute 44A could not sustain resolutions unsupported by an independent valid basis. It also held that student protection could be limited to issuance of transfer certificates for eligible students, while compulsory transfer to other colleges was declined. The University's refusal of affiliation was set aside and the State's challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304958