<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 384 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429960</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, affirming the ITAT&#039;s order. The ITAT had deleted additions related to AMP expenditure and disallowance under Section 14A, citing no international transaction for brand promotion and lack of exempt income, respectively. The decision aligned with prior rulings, pending the SC&#039;s judgment in a related matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 384 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429960</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, affirming the ITAT&#039;s order. The ITAT had deleted additions related to AMP expenditure and disallowance under Section 14A, citing no international transaction for brand promotion and lack of exempt income, respectively. The decision aligned with prior rulings, pending the SC&#039;s judgment in a related matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>