<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 382 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment order. The Tribunal held that the reopening was based on a change of opinion without new tangible material and did not comply with the proviso to section 147, as the AO failed to prove any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 382 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment order. The Tribunal held that the reopening was based on a change of opinion without new tangible material and did not comply with the proviso to section 147, as the AO failed to prove any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>