<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 355 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the revenue authorities&#039; findings that off-market share transactions were bogus and share subscription money received was unexplained. The assessee&#039;s failure to establish the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions resulted in the additions made by the Assessing Officer being confirmed. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the transactions were fabricated for illegal tax benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 09:20:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 355 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the revenue authorities&#039; findings that off-market share transactions were bogus and share subscription money received was unexplained. The assessee&#039;s failure to establish the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions resulted in the additions made by the Assessing Officer being confirmed. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the transactions were fabricated for illegal tax benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>