<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 345 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , JAIPUR BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429921</link>
    <description>For admission under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, a financial creditor must establish both the existence of a financial debt and default. Mere proof that money was disbursed, or reliance on bank entries, balance sheets, cheque dishonour material, TDS-related material and alleged acknowledgements, was found insufficient where the transaction&#039;s character remained disputed and the contractual terms of repayment, interest and tenure were not reliably proved. In the absence of proof that the amount was a loan advanced against time value of money, the dishonoured cheques and TDS deductions did not by themselves establish default. On the facts proved, the Section 7 application was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 09:20:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 345 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , JAIPUR BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429921</link>
      <description>For admission under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, a financial creditor must establish both the existence of a financial debt and default. Mere proof that money was disbursed, or reliance on bank entries, balance sheets, cheque dishonour material, TDS-related material and alleged acknowledgements, was found insufficient where the transaction&#039;s character remained disputed and the contractual terms of repayment, interest and tenure were not reliably proved. In the absence of proof that the amount was a loan advanced against time value of money, the dishonoured cheques and TDS deductions did not by themselves establish default. On the facts proved, the Section 7 application was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>