https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429918 The court dismissed the petition challenging an order under the Finance Act and CGST Act, 2017, where the petitioner failed to deposit the required amount under the SVLDR Scheme, 2019 by the deadline. The court emphasized adherence to Scheme terms without extensions, highlighting the government's authority to modify such terms. Referring to previous judgments, the court upheld the importance of strict compliance with Scheme provisions and directed the petitioner to seek remedy under the CGST Act, ultimately dismissing the petition and emphasizing the limitations of judicial intervention in these circumstances. en-us Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jul 2023 13:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429918 The court dismissed the petition challenging an order under the Finance Act and CGST Act, 2017, where the petitioner failed to deposit the required amount under the SVLDR Scheme, 2019 by the deadline. The court emphasized adherence to Scheme terms without extensions, highlighting the government's authority to modify such terms. Referring to previous judgments, the court upheld the importance of strict compliance with Scheme provisions and directed the petitioner to seek remedy under the CGST Act, ultimately dismissing the petition and emphasizing the limitations of judicial intervention in these circumstances. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429918