https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429917 The court found the retention of the security deposit unjustified due to conflicting views on service tax applicability. It directed the expeditious refund of the deposit and accrued interest to the petitioner. The decision was based on the lack of clarity regarding tax liability, emphasizing consistent interpretation of tax laws in contracts. en-us Sat, 29 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jul 2023 16:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429917 The court found the retention of the security deposit unjustified due to conflicting views on service tax applicability. It directed the expeditious refund of the deposit and accrued interest to the petitioner. The decision was based on the lack of clarity regarding tax liability, emphasizing consistent interpretation of tax laws in contracts. Case-Laws Service Tax Sat, 29 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429917