<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 338 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, recognizing the eligibility of CENVAT Credit on the computer server post-April 2016 and on Housekeeping Services. The penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was rescinded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 09:19:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 338 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, recognizing the eligibility of CENVAT Credit on the computer server post-April 2016 and on Housekeeping Services. The penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was rescinded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>