<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1438 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304946</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding a transfer pricing adjustment of Rs.13,48,02,885 for the assessment year 2014-15 under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The dispute focused on the inclusion of certain companies in the comparables list for software support services. The Tribunal excluded companies like Persistent Systems Ltd., Thirdware Solutions Ltd., and R.S. Software Ltd. due to functional dissimilarities and extraordinary financial events, emphasizing the importance of functional similarity in comparability analysis. The impugned order was set aside, directing a fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price by the AO/TPO, ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to a fair hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 23:15:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1438 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304946</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding a transfer pricing adjustment of Rs.13,48,02,885 for the assessment year 2014-15 under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The dispute focused on the inclusion of certain companies in the comparables list for software support services. The Tribunal excluded companies like Persistent Systems Ltd., Thirdware Solutions Ltd., and R.S. Software Ltd. due to functional dissimilarities and extraordinary financial events, emphasizing the importance of functional similarity in comparability analysis. The impugned order was set aside, directing a fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price by the AO/TPO, ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to a fair hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>