https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304949 In a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, strict compliance with the leave to defend procedure was required, and the absence of a duly placed application within time, together with repeated failures to honour settlement terms, meant the decree could not be reopened or the suit restored. The Court also held that a territorial jurisdiction objection could not be raised at the appellate stage after the appellants had entered settlements without disputing jurisdiction earlier. As a result, the appeal failed and the decree in the summary suit remained undisturbed with costs. en-us Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2022 23:15:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304949 In a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, strict compliance with the leave to defend procedure was required, and the absence of a duly placed application within time, together with repeated failures to honour settlement terms, meant the decree could not be reopened or the suit restored. The Court also held that a territorial jurisdiction objection could not be raised at the appellate stage after the appellants had entered settlements without disputing jurisdiction earlier. As a result, the appeal failed and the decree in the summary suit remained undisturbed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304949