<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (3) TMI 217 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304935</link>
    <description>The statutory appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is confined to an order or decision made in the High Court&#039;s exercise of jurisdiction to punish for contempt. A mere notice or order initiating contempt proceedings under Section 17 does not determine any rights or conclusively decide any contention of the alleged contemner, and therefore does not attract an appeal as of right. Interlocutory steps in contempt proceedings are not independently appealable; only a final order, or an earlier order that conclusively resolves a dispute raised by the alleged contemner, is appealable. An order merely commencing proceedings is thus not maintainable in appeal under Section 19(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 13:19:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (3) TMI 217 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304935</link>
      <description>The statutory appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is confined to an order or decision made in the High Court&#039;s exercise of jurisdiction to punish for contempt. A mere notice or order initiating contempt proceedings under Section 17 does not determine any rights or conclusively decide any contention of the alleged contemner, and therefore does not attract an appeal as of right. Interlocutory steps in contempt proceedings are not independently appealable; only a final order, or an earlier order that conclusively resolves a dispute raised by the alleged contemner, is appealable. An order merely commencing proceedings is thus not maintainable in appeal under Section 19(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>