https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30856 The Court denied the Petitioner's request for interim relief to stay the operation of notifications under Section 3(a) of the Central Excise Act. Emphasizing the need to balance legislative validity presumption, the Court found no demonstrated irreparable harm or imbalance of convenience. Tax recovery from the Petitioner under Section 3(a) was allowed, with the condition that the payment would not prejudice their rights and contentions in the ongoing case. en-us Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30856 The Court denied the Petitioner's request for interim relief to stay the operation of notifications under Section 3(a) of the Central Excise Act. Emphasizing the need to balance legislative validity presumption, the Court found no demonstrated irreparable harm or imbalance of convenience. Tax recovery from the Petitioner under Section 3(a) was allowed, with the condition that the payment would not prejudice their rights and contentions in the ongoing case. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30856