<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 296 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellant was not entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as the previous application was filed in the same proceeding before the competent authority. As the delay in filing the appeal exceeded the permissible extension, the Tribunal dismissed the condonation application and rejected the appeal memo.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 09:11:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 296 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellant was not entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as the previous application was filed in the same proceeding before the competent authority. As the delay in filing the appeal exceeded the permissible extension, the Tribunal dismissed the condonation application and rejected the appeal memo.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>