https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429871 Adverse remarks against an advocate were held unwarranted where they were based on an assumed conflict of interest not supported by the record. The advocate had appeared for a Resolution Professional in one insolvency process and had separately filed a section 7 application for a different company in independent proceedings, which did not amount to representing opposing interests in the same matter. As no professional misconduct or conflict was established, and the observations were not necessary for deciding the application, the remarks were directed to be expunged. en-us Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 06 Nov 2022 18:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429871 Adverse remarks against an advocate were held unwarranted where they were based on an assumed conflict of interest not supported by the record. The advocate had appeared for a Resolution Professional in one insolvency process and had separately filed a section 7 application for a different company in independent proceedings, which did not amount to representing opposing interests in the same matter. As no professional misconduct or conflict was established, and the observations were not necessary for deciding the application, the remarks were directed to be expunged. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429871