https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429871 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, expunging all adverse remarks made against the Appellant in the order dated 08.04.2022. The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority's conclusion regarding the alleged conflict of interest and collusion involving the Appellant was factually incorrect. It emphasized the importance of judicial restraint in making adverse remarks against counsel and clarified that the Appellant's representation of a separate entity did not breach professional ethics or conflict of interest in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. en-us Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 06 Nov 2022 18:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429871 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, expunging all adverse remarks made against the Appellant in the order dated 08.04.2022. The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority's conclusion regarding the alleged conflict of interest and collusion involving the Appellant was factually incorrect. It emphasized the importance of judicial restraint in making adverse remarks against counsel and clarified that the Appellant's representation of a separate entity did not breach professional ethics or conflict of interest in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429871