<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 290 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429866</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the Appellant, M/s. Matadin Mali, setting aside the service tax demands imposed for providing Labour Contract Services without registration. The Tribunal determined that the services provided did not qualify as manpower recruitment agency services based on the contractual terms and lack of evidence supporting such classification. The judgment allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the Appellant by deeming the service tax demands unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 09:11:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 290 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429866</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the Appellant, M/s. Matadin Mali, setting aside the service tax demands imposed for providing Labour Contract Services without registration. The Tribunal determined that the services provided did not qualify as manpower recruitment agency services based on the contractual terms and lack of evidence supporting such classification. The judgment allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the Appellant by deeming the service tax demands unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>