https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429860 A specific arbitration clause covering disputes on validity, interpretation, implementation, breach and termination supported reference to arbitration, and the existence of related agreements or earlier proceedings required deeper examination rather than rejection at the Section 11(6) stage. Pending oppression and mismanagement proceedings before the NCLT did not by itself bar appointment of an arbitrator where the contractual dispute was distinct. The court therefore held that questions on interconnectedness and arbitrability should be left to the arbitral forum, and the request for appointment of an arbitrator was allowed for the Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement dated 27.04.2016. en-us Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2022 09:10:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429860 A specific arbitration clause covering disputes on validity, interpretation, implementation, breach and termination supported reference to arbitration, and the existence of related agreements or earlier proceedings required deeper examination rather than rejection at the Section 11(6) stage. Pending oppression and mismanagement proceedings before the NCLT did not by itself bar appointment of an arbitrator where the contractual dispute was distinct. The court therefore held that questions on interconnectedness and arbitrability should be left to the arbitral forum, and the request for appointment of an arbitrator was allowed for the Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement dated 27.04.2016. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429860