https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429856 The court quashed the FIR against the petitioner-Company, emphasizing its status as an intermediary under the Information Technology Act, 2000. The court held that the Company's compliance with due diligence and intermediary guidelines exempted it from liability for actions of third-party sellers. Referring to legal precedents, the court found the allegations in the FIR insufficient to establish an offence by the petitioner-Company, leading to the quashing of the FIR and police report. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned FIR was set aside and quashed. en-us Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2022 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429856 The court quashed the FIR against the petitioner-Company, emphasizing its status as an intermediary under the Information Technology Act, 2000. The court held that the Company's compliance with due diligence and intermediary guidelines exempted it from liability for actions of third-party sellers. Referring to legal precedents, the court found the allegations in the FIR insufficient to establish an offence by the petitioner-Company, leading to the quashing of the FIR and police report. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned FIR was set aside and quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429856