https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429855 The court upheld the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, sentencing the petitioner to one year of Rigorous Imprisonment and directing payment of compensation. The delay in filing the revision petition was condoned. The court found the petitioner guilty of issuing a dishonored cheque in discharge of a legally enforceable debt, rejecting claims of the cheque being a security cheque. The petitioner failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 N.I.A., leading to the dismissal of the petition due to lack of merit. en-us Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2022 09:10:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429855 The court upheld the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, sentencing the petitioner to one year of Rigorous Imprisonment and directing payment of compensation. The delay in filing the revision petition was condoned. The court found the petitioner guilty of issuing a dishonored cheque in discharge of a legally enforceable debt, rejecting claims of the cheque being a security cheque. The petitioner failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 N.I.A., leading to the dismissal of the petition due to lack of merit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429855