https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429855 Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a signed blank cheque or security cheque did not, on the facts proved, displace the statutory presumption under Section 139. The accused had to rebut that presumption with cogent evidence, and in the absence of defence evidence the complainant's version remained unrebutted, so liability subsisted. The revisional court also found no perversity, illegality, or misreading of evidence in the concurrent findings of conviction, and held that revision does not lie merely because another view is possible. The conviction and sentence were therefore sustained. en-us Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2022 09:10:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429855 Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a signed blank cheque or security cheque did not, on the facts proved, displace the statutory presumption under Section 139. The accused had to rebut that presumption with cogent evidence, and in the absence of defence evidence the complainant's version remained unrebutted, so liability subsisted. The revisional court also found no perversity, illegality, or misreading of evidence in the concurrent findings of conviction, and held that revision does not lie merely because another view is possible. The conviction and sentence were therefore sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429855