https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304928 The court set aside the detention order dated 30/10/2018 as the State Government's delay in considering the detenu's representation until the Advisory Board's report was received violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The court found this delay to be against the constitutional mandate, thereby infringing the detenu's rights. Consequently, the detenu was ordered to be released immediately if not needed in any other case. en-us Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:46:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304928 The court set aside the detention order dated 30/10/2018 as the State Government's delay in considering the detenu's representation until the Advisory Board's report was received violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The court found this delay to be against the constitutional mandate, thereby infringing the detenu's rights. Consequently, the detenu was ordered to be released immediately if not needed in any other case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304928