<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 174 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30850</link>
    <description>The court upheld that the expenditure for issuing debentures falls under section 35D, to be spread over ten years. Interest on direct borrowings for investment in securities is not allowable as business expenditure, aligning with section 14A. The court dismissed both parties&#039; appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on these matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 174 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30850</link>
      <description>The court upheld that the expenditure for issuing debentures falls under section 35D, to be spread over ten years. Interest on direct borrowings for investment in securities is not allowable as business expenditure, aligning with section 14A. The court dismissed both parties&#039; appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on these matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>