https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30849 The court upheld the validity of the acquisition order under section 269UD(1) of the Income-tax Act, finding no infirmity in the determination of fair market value. Despite delays in tendering the apparent consideration, disputes over apportionment and title justified the deposit under section 269UG(3), preserving the acquisition order. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed, and the rule discharged without costs. en-us Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30849 The court upheld the validity of the acquisition order under section 269UD(1) of the Income-tax Act, finding no infirmity in the determination of fair market value. Despite delays in tendering the apparent consideration, disputes over apportionment and title justified the deposit under section 269UG(3), preserving the acquisition order. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed, and the rule discharged without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30849