https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30848 The High Court held that the Assessing Officer's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue for accepting the revised computation of income without a revised return filed by the assessee within the prescribed period. The Court emphasized that the correction of the return by the authorized representative was sufficient and did not necessitate a revised return signed by a specified person. The Court referenced relevant provisions and case law to support its decision. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and no costs were awarded. en-us Thu, 24 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30848 The High Court held that the Assessing Officer's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue for accepting the revised computation of income without a revised return filed by the assessee within the prescribed period. The Court emphasized that the correction of the return by the authorized representative was sufficient and did not necessitate a revised return signed by a specified person. The Court referenced relevant provisions and case law to support its decision. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 24 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30848