<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 242 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30847</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled that the additional compensation received under interim orders was not taxable as capital gains under section 45(5)(b) until the final determination by the High Court. The appeal was allowed in part, with no costs, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the reopening of the assessment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 242 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30847</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled that the additional compensation received under interim orders was not taxable as capital gains under section 45(5)(b) until the final determination by the High Court. The appeal was allowed in part, with no costs, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the reopening of the assessment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>