<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 278 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429854</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s writ challenging GST registration cancellation due to clerical error. The court found the cancellation was an inadvertent mistake during application processing. HC directed Deputy Commissioner to restore registration within two weeks and permitted manual filing of restoration application. The case was resolved in favor of the petitioner without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 278 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429854</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s writ challenging GST registration cancellation due to clerical error. The court found the cancellation was an inadvertent mistake during application processing. HC directed Deputy Commissioner to restore registration within two weeks and permitted manual filing of restoration application. The case was resolved in favor of the petitioner without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>