https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429843 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute concerning the classification of goods under the DEPB Schedule. It held that the appellant's product, 'Surimi,' was correctly classified under Sr.No.2/66 based on a clarification from the DGFT. The tribunal emphasized the importance of the DGFT's decision overruling the department's classification and allowed the appeal, affirming the appellant's entitlement to DEPB credit for exporting 'Surimi' under the specified category. en-us Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429843 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute concerning the classification of goods under the DEPB Schedule. It held that the appellant's product, 'Surimi,' was correctly classified under Sr.No.2/66 based on a clarification from the DGFT. The tribunal emphasized the importance of the DGFT's decision overruling the department's classification and allowed the appeal, affirming the appellant's entitlement to DEPB credit for exporting 'Surimi' under the specified category. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429843