<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 266 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision regarding the classification of services provided by the appellant to GSECL. This decision was made in light of a change in legal position due to a Supreme Court judgment in a similar case, emphasizing the need to compare facts and legal aspects between the present case and the precedent case for a just conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2022 12:09:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 266 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision regarding the classification of services provided by the appellant to GSECL. This decision was made in light of a change in legal position due to a Supreme Court judgment in a similar case, emphasizing the need to compare facts and legal aspects between the present case and the precedent case for a just conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>