https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429838 The Court quashed the Assessment Order due to deficiencies in the show cause notice, emphasizing the necessity of providing detailed information for effective response. Respondent No.3 was directed to issue a new notice with comprehensive details within two weeks. The Court outlined timelines for response and final assessment, stressing the need for justifying any disagreements in the assessment order. While refraining from awarding costs, the Court warned respondents about future consequences, including adverse career observations. The decision highlighted the importance of procedural fairness, proper training for officers, and adherence to legal principles in administrative proceedings. en-us Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429838 The Court quashed the Assessment Order due to deficiencies in the show cause notice, emphasizing the necessity of providing detailed information for effective response. Respondent No.3 was directed to issue a new notice with comprehensive details within two weeks. The Court outlined timelines for response and final assessment, stressing the need for justifying any disagreements in the assessment order. While refraining from awarding costs, the Court warned respondents about future consequences, including adverse career observations. The decision highlighted the importance of procedural fairness, proper training for officers, and adherence to legal principles in administrative proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429838