<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 991 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304918</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was unsustainable as the correct provision for the year was Section 271AAA. The Tribunal found that the jurisdictional challenge was not a mere technical defect and could not be cured under Section 292B. The order imposing the penalty was canceled, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2022 11:29:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 991 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304918</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was unsustainable as the correct provision for the year was Section 271AAA. The Tribunal found that the jurisdictional challenge was not a mere technical defect and could not be cured under Section 292B. The order imposing the penalty was canceled, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>