<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 258 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429834</link>
    <description>Government entity filed an advance ruling application on GST-related service questions. SC determined that the application fell outside the jurisdictional scope of advance ruling authority since the queries focused on services received rather than services provided. Consequently, the SC rejected the application under Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017, citing procedural limitations on advance ruling requests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 258 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429834</link>
      <description>Government entity filed an advance ruling application on GST-related service questions. SC determined that the application fell outside the jurisdictional scope of advance ruling authority since the queries focused on services received rather than services provided. Consequently, the SC rejected the application under Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017, citing procedural limitations on advance ruling requests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>