<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 289 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30841</link>
    <description>The Kerala General Sales Tax Act empowered the revenue board to issue administrative directions for proper tax administration, and a circular treating field latex and centrifuged latex as the same commodity was valid as a binding administrative measure. The circular could lawfully provide relief to avoid unfair or double taxation and did not amount to unauthorised legislation or encroachment on the legislative field. Tax authorities were bound by the circular until it was withdrawn or amended, so reassessment proceedings contrary to it were unsustainable. The later government notification did not negate the board&#039;s earlier administrative power or the binding effect of the circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 289 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30841</link>
      <description>The Kerala General Sales Tax Act empowered the revenue board to issue administrative directions for proper tax administration, and a circular treating field latex and centrifuged latex as the same commodity was valid as a binding administrative measure. The circular could lawfully provide relief to avoid unfair or double taxation and did not amount to unauthorised legislation or encroachment on the legislative field. Tax authorities were bound by the circular until it was withdrawn or amended, so reassessment proceedings contrary to it were unsustainable. The later government notification did not negate the board&#039;s earlier administrative power or the binding effect of the circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>