<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 249 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429825</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Respondents to demand the compounding fee from the Appellant in accordance with revised guidelines. The Respondents were directed to complete this process within six weeks, with the Appellant required to pay the amount to the Revenue upon demand. The Writ Appeal was allowed without costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 249 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429825</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Respondents to demand the compounding fee from the Appellant in accordance with revised guidelines. The Respondents were directed to complete this process within six weeks, with the Appellant required to pay the amount to the Revenue upon demand. The Writ Appeal was allowed without costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>