<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 243 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429819</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Rajkot&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 35 crores made by the Assessing Officer on account of notional interest. The Tribunal emphasized that only real income, not hypothetical income, can be taxed, citing judicial precedents. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that no actual income accrued to the assessee, and therefore, the notional interest could not be taxed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2022 08:30:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 243 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429819</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Rajkot&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 35 crores made by the Assessing Officer on account of notional interest. The Tribunal emphasized that only real income, not hypothetical income, can be taxed, citing judicial precedents. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that no actual income accrued to the assessee, and therefore, the notional interest could not be taxed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>