<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 233 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429809</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for subsequent years, delete the disallowance of Mark to Market (MTM) loss, and recompute the disallowance under section 14A considering only investments yielding exempt income during the year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 233 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429809</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for subsequent years, delete the disallowance of Mark to Market (MTM) loss, and recompute the disallowance under section 14A considering only investments yielding exempt income during the year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>