<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 229 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal concerning the disallowance of interest expenses under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s enhancement of income, citing lack of jurisdiction. However, the Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s addition of interest on the income tax refund, as the assessee failed to provide substantial evidence against it. The appeal for ITA No. 298/JP/2017 was allowed, while ITA No. 299/JP/2017 was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 229 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal concerning the disallowance of interest expenses under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s enhancement of income, citing lack of jurisdiction. However, the Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s addition of interest on the income tax refund, as the assessee failed to provide substantial evidence against it. The appeal for ITA No. 298/JP/2017 was allowed, while ITA No. 299/JP/2017 was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>