<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 222 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429798</link>
    <description>The court upheld the detention order as legally and constitutionally valid, dismissing the writ petition. The petitioner&#039;s claims regarding malice, delay, subjective satisfaction, vital documents, word usage, legal mandates, application of mind, investigation, and procedural safeguards were deemed unsubstantiated. The court found the detention order to be properly issued by the competent authority after due consideration, complying with legal requirements and safeguards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2022 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 222 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429798</link>
      <description>The court upheld the detention order as legally and constitutionally valid, dismissing the writ petition. The petitioner&#039;s claims regarding malice, delay, subjective satisfaction, vital documents, word usage, legal mandates, application of mind, investigation, and procedural safeguards were deemed unsubstantiated. The court found the detention order to be properly issued by the competent authority after due consideration, complying with legal requirements and safeguards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>