<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1343 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304905</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed Ground No. 4 in favor of the assessee, ruling that the provision for foreseeable losses was justified and should not be added back while computing Book Profits under Section 115JB of the Act. The decision emphasized the importance of properly adjudicating raised grounds and considering arguments from both parties. The outcome highlights the necessity of interpreting tax provisions diligently to ensure fairness in decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 21:32:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1343 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304905</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed Ground No. 4 in favor of the assessee, ruling that the provision for foreseeable losses was justified and should not be added back while computing Book Profits under Section 115JB of the Act. The decision emphasized the importance of properly adjudicating raised grounds and considering arguments from both parties. The outcome highlights the necessity of interpreting tax provisions diligently to ensure fairness in decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>