https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304909 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring the actions of private and state-run medical institutions in levying advance fees and requiring bank guarantees from students as illegal. The court directed institutions to cease these practices, accept bonds instead of bank guarantees, and comply with fee regulations set by the State's Fee Regulatory Committee. The court deemed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) maintainable, emphasizing the petitioner's advocacy for students' interests. en-us Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2022 21:32:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304909 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring the actions of private and state-run medical institutions in levying advance fees and requiring bank guarantees from students as illegal. The court directed institutions to cease these practices, accept bonds instead of bank guarantees, and comply with fee regulations set by the State's Fee Regulatory Committee. The court deemed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) maintainable, emphasizing the petitioner's advocacy for students' interests. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304909