https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304911 Common entrance testing and centralised counselling for medical and dental admissions were upheld as valid regulatory measures because the right to establish and administer educational institutions does not include a right to maladminister. The Court accepted that minority and non-minority institutions may be subjected to reasonable regulation to secure merit, transparency, fairness, and educational standards, especially in professional education. It also held that the admission framework was designed to prevent capitation fee and commercialisation and did not place minority institutions at a disadvantage or destroy their character or autonomy. The challenge under Articles 19(1)(g), 25, 26, 29(1), and 30 therefore failed. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2022 21:32:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304911 Common entrance testing and centralised counselling for medical and dental admissions were upheld as valid regulatory measures because the right to establish and administer educational institutions does not include a right to maladminister. The Court accepted that minority and non-minority institutions may be subjected to reasonable regulation to secure merit, transparency, fairness, and educational standards, especially in professional education. It also held that the admission framework was designed to prevent capitation fee and commercialisation and did not place minority institutions at a disadvantage or destroy their character or autonomy. The challenge under Articles 19(1)(g), 25, 26, 29(1), and 30 therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304911