https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429749 The HC quashed the orders dated 26.04.2022 and 27.04.2022 issued under Section 26(3) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, ruling that transactions before the 2016 Amendment Act are not covered. The writ petitions were allowed, miscellaneous applications closed, and no costs were ordered. en-us Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429749 The HC quashed the orders dated 26.04.2022 and 27.04.2022 issued under Section 26(3) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, ruling that transactions before the 2016 Amendment Act are not covered. The writ petitions were allowed, miscellaneous applications closed, and no costs were ordered. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429749