https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429744 The appeals were allowed, setting aside the interim order of the Single Judge. The writ petitions were dismissed as not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court emphasized that the rejection of nominations for directorship in a private bank lacked a public law element, making them unsuitable for writ jurisdiction. Parties were advised to seek remedies under the Companies Act, 2013, or civil courts if statutory violations were alleged. The decision focused on the maintainability of the writ petitions rather than the substantive merits of the case. en-us Tue, 25 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2022 09:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429744 The appeals were allowed, setting aside the interim order of the Single Judge. The writ petitions were dismissed as not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court emphasized that the rejection of nominations for directorship in a private bank lacked a public law element, making them unsuitable for writ jurisdiction. Parties were advised to seek remedies under the Companies Act, 2013, or civil courts if statutory violations were alleged. The decision focused on the maintainability of the writ petitions rather than the substantive merits of the case. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 25 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429744