<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 163 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429739</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority found that the Corporate Debtor had an operational debt due to the Operational Creditor, which was established as unpaid. Despite reminders and a demand notice, the Corporate Debtor failed to make further payments, leading to the admission of the debt. The debt exceeded Rs. 1 lakh, was undisputed, and the demand notice was effectively served. The Adjudicating Authority concluded that all conditions for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the IBC were met, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and admission of the application, triggering the CIRP without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 163 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429739</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority found that the Corporate Debtor had an operational debt due to the Operational Creditor, which was established as unpaid. Despite reminders and a demand notice, the Corporate Debtor failed to make further payments, leading to the admission of the debt. The debt exceeded Rs. 1 lakh, was undisputed, and the demand notice was effectively served. The Adjudicating Authority concluded that all conditions for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the IBC were met, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and admission of the application, triggering the CIRP without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>