<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 162 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429738</link>
    <description>A recall application cannot be used to reopen a merits-based order where the earlier application was already heard and rejected; the relief sought was therefore in substance a review. The tribunal&#039;s power to recall is confined to exceptional situations such as fraud, mistake, or lack of jurisdiction, none of which was shown. A rectification provision does not apply to correct or revisit a substantive decision, and the procedural basis invoked for inherent powers did not assist on these facts. The Adjudicating Authority was therefore right to refuse entertainment of the recall application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 08:51:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 162 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429738</link>
      <description>A recall application cannot be used to reopen a merits-based order where the earlier application was already heard and rejected; the relief sought was therefore in substance a review. The tribunal&#039;s power to recall is confined to exceptional situations such as fraud, mistake, or lack of jurisdiction, none of which was shown. A rectification provision does not apply to correct or revisit a substantive decision, and the procedural basis invoked for inherent powers did not assist on these facts. The Adjudicating Authority was therefore right to refuse entertainment of the recall application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>