<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 158 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429734</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to admit the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal emphasized that the Corporate Debtor&#039;s liability for the debt of a proprietary concern was established, but due to the lack of intent for insolvency resolution and ongoing family business disputes, the Financial Creditor&#039;s refusal of payment led to the dismissal of the application. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed family members to intervene in the matter but stressed that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process should not be pursued for purposes other than insolvency resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 08:51:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 158 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429734</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to admit the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal emphasized that the Corporate Debtor&#039;s liability for the debt of a proprietary concern was established, but due to the lack of intent for insolvency resolution and ongoing family business disputes, the Financial Creditor&#039;s refusal of payment led to the dismissal of the application. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed family members to intervene in the matter but stressed that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process should not be pursued for purposes other than insolvency resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>