<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 144 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429720</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the revision petitions, modifying the sentences to ensure compliance with the statutory limit on fines under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court directed the accused to pay fines within a specified timeframe and undergo modified sentences, emphasizing uniformity in calculating interest for imposing fines in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 144 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429720</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the revision petitions, modifying the sentences to ensure compliance with the statutory limit on fines under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court directed the accused to pay fines within a specified timeframe and undergo modified sentences, emphasizing uniformity in calculating interest for imposing fines in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>