<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 143 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429719</link>
    <description>Where the core allegation concerns dishonour of a cheque issued for payment of supplied goods, the dispute falls within the Negotiable Instruments Act rather than Sections 406 and 420 IPC. An FIR-based criminal prosecution in that setting is legally unsustainable because the governing remedy is a complaint under the special statutory procedure in Section 142. The proceeding and cognizance order were therefore quashed, while the complainant remained free to pursue the appropriate complaint remedy under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 08:50:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 143 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429719</link>
      <description>Where the core allegation concerns dishonour of a cheque issued for payment of supplied goods, the dispute falls within the Negotiable Instruments Act rather than Sections 406 and 420 IPC. An FIR-based criminal prosecution in that setting is legally unsustainable because the governing remedy is a complaint under the special statutory procedure in Section 142. The proceeding and cognizance order were therefore quashed, while the complainant remained free to pursue the appropriate complaint remedy under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>