<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1300 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304901</link>
    <description>The LPA in a PMLA matter was disposed of after both sides agreed that the dispute should be heard finally by the Single Judge. The respondents stated that they would not press the interim order and would not file contempt proceedings, while the appellant requested early disposal. The Division Bench accordingly granted liberty to the parties to argue before the Single Judge on the scheduled hearing date and requested an early decision. Pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 08:50:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1300 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304901</link>
      <description>The LPA in a PMLA matter was disposed of after both sides agreed that the dispute should be heard finally by the Single Judge. The respondents stated that they would not press the interim order and would not file contempt proceedings, while the appellant requested early disposal. The Division Bench accordingly granted liberty to the parties to argue before the Single Judge on the scheduled hearing date and requested an early decision. Pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>